The image “http://www.votetrustusa.org/images/votetrust-small2.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

 

The nation's clearinghouse for election audit information!
State and Local Election Integrity Organizations
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Maryland
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Montana
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
Ohio
Oregon
Pennsylvania
South Carolina
Tennessee
Texas
Vermont
Virginia
Wisconsin
VoteTrustUSA does not speak on behalf of any of the listed organizations.
: mosShowVIMenu( $params ); break; } ?>

   
Around the States

House Republicans Confuse Voters PDF Print Email
By Jerry Depew, Iowans for Voting Integrity   
March 23, 2006
This article was published on IowaVoters.org on Wednesday, March 22nd, 2006. It is reposted here with permission of the author.

In a disgusting, audacious, undemocratic and irresponsible display of irrational law-making, the Iowa House of Representatives has passed a bill mandating both paper trails and photo IDs at Iowa’s polling places.

Despite a 98-0 vote on the paper trail portion of the bill, we may be no closer to getting them. That is because the House also voted 51-48 (along party lines) NOT to pass the paper trail part by itself. Such a vote would have sent it quickly to the Governor’s desk since the Senate passed its bill already, also without dissent.

Linked to the poison pill bill for photo identification, the whole thing is likely to die. The ID portion of the bill was opposed by the Secretary of State, AARP, Governor’s Developmental Disabilities Council, ACLU, ISEA, IFL-CIO and by every House Democrat. Senate Democrats will likely keep the bill from passing there.

So do House Republicans want paper trails and verifiable election equipment, or not? Not one legislator in either House has voted against the paper trail language. But every House Republican agreed to sacrifice the good idea in order to advance a bad idea.

This was irresponsible because there is overwhelming public support for paper ballots.

This was audacious because the Republicans never even tried to make the case for requiring voters to show photo identification. When asked for cases of fraud that could be prevented under this bill, they did not answer.

This was irrational because Iowa law already allows pollwatchers to challenge suspicious voters and also allows election workers to seek identification from unfamiliar voters if they see fit.

This was undemocratic because it will reduce voter turnout. Up to ten percent of the electorate may lack ID cards. Shut-in voters now need their own photocopier at home so they can include a copy of their ID card with their absentee ballot. Since ID cards are not free, requiring one may constitute a poll tax which is prohibitted by the 24th Amendment.

This was disgusting because now all members of the body can say they voted for paper trails and both parties can blame the other for the bill’s ultimate demise.

Disgusting, undemocratic, audacious, irrational and irresponsible. Not a bad day’s work.
Comment on This Article
You must login to leave comments...


Other Visitors Comments
There are no comments currently....
< Prev   Next >
State Resources
Election Law @ Moritz
Electionline
National Conference of State Legislatures
Verified Voting
Model Legislation
: mosShowVIMenu( $params ); break; } ?>
State Pages
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Jersey
New Hampshire
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Guam
Puerto Rico
: mosShowVIMenu( $params ); break; } ?>