The image “http://www.votetrustusa.org/images/votetrust-small2.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

 

   
National Issues

Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing Heads to DC PDF Print Email
By Joyce McCloy, North Carolina Coalition for Verified Voting   
January 01, 2007

Does the Election Center lobby for the voters' or for the interest of the voting industry?

 

The Fox in the Henhouse Series, Part III

 


This week a “wolf in sheep’s clothing”, The Election Center, will be in Washington DC in full force to lobby our Congressmen. The Joint Election Officials Liaison Committee, comprised of election administrators associated with a range of professional organizations, will be gathering on the first days of the new legislative session to influence decisions, like they influence the actions and decisions of state election directors across the country.

According to the meeting’s description on the Election Center website:

“We have booked rooms for the nights of January 3- 6, 2007 at the Grand Hyatt Washington, 1000 H St, N.W., Washington, DC, for the next meeting of those elections and registration administrators who wish to be involved on a national level for Congressional liaison and activity with the Federal agencies affecting voter registration and elections at the local level.
Come to Washington to talk directly with Congressional staff about the new legislation. Additionally, we invite the Federal Voting Assistance Program, the Commissioners and staff of the Election Assistance Commission, the U.S. Justice Department and the GAO to present.”

They plan to lobby hard.


It is safe to assume that the Election Center will continue its advocacy of paperless DREs. In May of 2003, R. Doug Lewis of the Election Center widely distributed a letter stating that DREs cannot be tampered with. Lewis's opinion carries a great deal of weight with election officials. As a spokesman, Lewis has steadfastly defended the machines and blamed voters and pollworkers for any election problems.

According to Dr. David L. Dill, of Stanford University, this letter by Lewis demonstrates profoundly disturbing complacency and a serious lack of understanding of computer security, and, indeed, computer technology, by the very organization that is supposed to ensure the integrity of the systems we are worried about.

At its website, the Election Center states this lofty mission statement:

“The Election Center is a nonprofit organization dedicated to promoting, preserving, and improving democracy. Its members are government employees whose profession is to serve in voter registration and elections administration.”
But who are the members ‘members’ of the Election, and on whose behalf of whose interests will the lobbying efforts be directed? If you read the fine print, the Election Center counts voting machine vendors among its members. The Election Center is “improving democracy” while protecting the bottom line of the businesses that benefit from its decisions. According to an article in the San Jose Mercury News, they help each other out:
"The Election Center" has financial ties to the top 3 voting machine companies: Doug Lewis admits that "The Election Center" received money from Diebold, Sequoia and ES&S as well.
A review of the description of  “Corporate Members”, as listed on the Election Center's “Membership Information” page:
“Corporate Member: $800 per year: Businesses and corporations are offered this level for membership. Corporate members receive all rights and privileges of membership. Corporate members are given one free Associate Member and additional memberships can be provided at $80 each. Corporate members also receive a $500 discount when displaying as exhibitors at the National Conference.”

The Election Center has managed to embed itself in all aspects of our elections, with former Board of Directors and members serving as state and local election officials across the country. Member Donetta Davidson an ardent opponent of voter verified paper ballots, is the incoming Chair of the Election Assistance Commission. Lewis, and several other Election Center members serve on the EAC’s Advisory Board.

 

The message delivered by the Election Center will no doubt be just what the voting machine manufacturers want it to be: everything's fine, there were a few 'glitches' easily dismissed as the result of 'human error' and more money should be spent buying touchscreen voting machines.
Comment on This Article
You must login to leave comments...


Other Visitors Comments
There are no comments currently....
Next >
National Pages
Federal Government
Federal Legislation
Help America Vote Act (HAVA)
Election Assistance Commission (EAC)
Federal Election Commission
Department of Justice - Voting Section
Non-Government Institutions
NASS
NASED
Independent Testing Authority
The Election Center
Carter Baker Commission
Topics
General
Voting System Standards
Electoral College
Accessibility
Open Source Voting System Software
Proposed Legislation
Voting Rights
Campaign Finance
Overseas/Military Voting
Canada
Electronic Verification
: mosShowVIMenu( $params ); break; } ?>